Can AI Be a Force for Sustainability?

I grew up with technology all around me, like from the start, since the internet was just getting big when I was a kid. For people my age, AI feels normal, not scary, it’s just part of how we think and do things. But lately I’ve been wondering if all this tech is really helping the planet or if it’s making stuff worse in ways we don’t see right away.

It seems like AI could team up with sustainability to change how we move forward, but we are not there yet, not even close I think. The problems are piling up fast. Before AI got huge, the earth was already in trouble, and now it’s adding more weight instead of fixing things.

Take the energy side, data centers are eating up power like crazy. Projections say by 2028, AI could use almost half the electricity going to those places, which matches up to a big chunk of what homes in the US use. And were only in 2026 basically, the numbers keep climbing. It’s not just power though, the metals for hardware come from rare minerals we mine too quickly and recycle almost nothing of, maybe 7 percent or so. Water for cooling is another issue, especially where it’s scarce.

In places like my area, old mines are getting attention again because there is interest in those minerals for chips. It’s like a new kind of race, reminds me of old rivalries. That hits close, seeing how it can affect local places.

Sometimes I get frustrated looking at how we throw AI at random things. Like when image generators first came out, everyone was excited, making art or designs from words, that was cool. But then it turned into endless creating, most of it unused, just wasting energy on nothing.

Same with videos, when tools launched, people overloaded the system, it slowed everything because it’s so demanding. Now on social feeds, posts look identical, all AI made, same words and looks, it’s starting to blend into boring noise. I use it to tweak ideas myself, but there’s a line between helping your brain and letting it do everything.

Even fun apps for editing faces or aging pictures, they’re okay for laughs, but when most power goes to memes instead of real help, it feels off, like we could aim higher.

On the good side, though, AI can do amazing stuff if pointed right. For instance, a while back, I built a tech project targeting the Peruvian Amazon, using data from water tests and reports in order to map pollution spots, showing where it’s worst for communities. Humans couldn’t look through all those datasets alone, but the system connected it, giving reasonable insights. That kind of thing changes how you see tech, proves it can serve when used well.

Zooming out, AI could optimize energy from renewables, track waste in supply chains, predict climate shifts for better farming or setups. These aren’t just ideas, they’re happening where tech gets used carefully, the tools are there!

I think the real issue is us, not AI. Sustainability comes down to how people handle tech, including me in that. Companies need teams focused on it, not side gigs, engineers should know their servers power source, size things right to cut waste. Consumers too, we waste by generating junk or using big models for tiny tasks, like math a simple program could do. Being careful with AI use matters as much as building it.

We’re in a hype bubble now, like past tech booms, everyone mentions AI on pitch decks for funding. But if a basic algorithm works better and cheaper, why force AI, often it’s just for the show, wasting what we can’t spare. Worse, some trust AI too soon for important stuff, like legal docs or code without checks, then edge problems hit and it’s too late to fix. In my opinion human & machine mix is the key – unsupervised decisional tasks are not yet there.

A good example of how rushed these AI things can get happened pretty recently with OpenClaw. It’s this open source AI assistant that blew up online. People were super into it because it could handle stuff like emails or browsing and even do everyday tasks right from WhatsApp or iMessage – that’s why it got over 145,000 stars on GitHub so fast. Everyone wanted their own personal agent until some things started to go wrong from the security perspective. I won’t get into technical details, but for me, OpenClaw shows what goes wrong when the hype for AI races ahead of making sure it’s safe. Thousands of users let this agent have full control over their computers, basically root level access. Nobody stopped to see if the basics were even there to trust it with that. And from what came out, they were not solid at all. This part gets a bit messy to explain, but it stands out as a warning I guess.

We don’t need smarter tech, it’s plenty powerful already, scaling fast. What we need is responsible and intentional use. It feels like tech should blend in, help daily without harm.

———–
Get a copy of WE HAVE A DREAM 201 Dreams 201 Countries

Scroll to Top